Despite Florida Department of Corrections' continuing attempts to rob 'Miami Harold' Hempstead of his Freedom of Speech, he continues to speak out fearlessly about the killing of Darren Rainey in a locked chamber of super-heated steam in Dade prison, 2012. His latest statements, published 8th April, 2017, criticizing the attempted suppression and cover-up by Florida D.C. and State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle's office are signed under the name by which he's becoming increasingly known these days - 'Caged Crusader.'
Caged Crusader
HAROLD HEMPSTEAD TRANSFERRED TO TDOC ON 3/17/17
TO HINDER HIS COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE MEDIA ON THE DARREN RAINEY MURDER CASE.
I believe that one of the reasons I was
transferred from the Florida Department of Corrections (FDC) on 3/17/17 to the
Tennessee Department of Corrections (TDOC) was to hinder my communications with
the media on the Darren Rainey murder case.
Why else would I have been sent outside of Florida 2 states away from
Florida on the same day the Dade County State Attorney released their decision
to not prosecute in the Darren Rainey case?
The Dade County State Attorney and FDC knew this
would extremely hinder my ability to communicate with the media about the Dade
County State Attorney’s decision and about their extreme twisting of the
facts. They knew that I would challenge their
statements and twisting the most, so they decided to send me to another state
on the same day they released their decisions.
By doing what they did it has made it where the State Attorney can tell
their twisted facts on why they aren’t going to prosecute and the person who
knows this case the best (me) (other than the media) is extremely hindered in
challenging their statements. Because I
was deposited into another state prison system with none of my property on the day
the State Attorney released their decision.
The things that FDC will do to cover up their
evils and try to discredit their witnesses.
Please share this blog with your friends. Please share this blog with anybody you know
that can help with getting justice for Darren Rainey. Please sign our petition on Change.org
entitled THE LIFE OF BLACK, MENTALLY
DISABLED MUSLIM PRISONER DARREN RAINEY DOES MATTER.
Caged Crusader
----------------------------------------
Please follow Harold Hempstead's blog for regular updates:
Harold Hempstead Caged Crusader Wordpress
WHY DID DADE COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY KATHERINE
FERNANDEZ RUNDLE FOCUS ON SMALL IRRELEVANT FACTS WHEN SHE DECIDED TO NOT
PROSECUTE IN THE DARREN RAINEY MURDER?
If you go to the Pinellas County, Florida Clerk
of Court records for the case I’m in prison on (Case No.: CRC 99-05695 FANO)
it’ll show that my State Attorney used the following in Voir Dire as a way to
tell the jury to not focus on small irrelevant facts that have no bearing on
the trial. The State Attorney said
“Ladies and gentlemen, imagine if you would, you were at the Superbowl with
fifty thousand people watching it in the stadium with you. A man jumps out of the sitting area on to the
field and kills a player. Everybody
watched the killing, you were all eyewitnesses, but none of your statements
will be identical. All the eyewitnesses
will say the man who went on the field killed the player, but outside of that,
to some degree or another, all the statements will be different. Some might say it was sunny, others might say
it was cloudy, many will say the killer was wearing clothing that he wasn’t
wearing; and so on and so forth. The important thing about their statements is
not the irrelevant facts, but that they all agreed that the man who went on the
field killed the player”
Now the foregoing to some degree was improper in
my trial because I wasn’t on trial for murder.
I was on trial for burglaries and dealing in stolen property. However, what the State Attorney was in
essence telling the jurors in my trial was to not focus on the small irrelevant
facts but focus on the relevant facts.
From my 18 years of reading case law I have
learned that it is a common thing for State Attorneys to tell jurors to not
focus on the small, irrelevant facts but only on relevant facts. As a certified paralegal I also learned the
reasoning behind this in my college studies.
Small irrelevant facts have no bearing on a case.
Now please keep these things in mind as I
explain something important the Dade County State Attorney stated in their
3/17/17 written decision to not prosecute anybody for murdering Darren Rainey.
Multiple inmates that the State Attorney can
verify were in the wing on the night Rainey was murdered gave statements during
the investigation. All of these inmates
agreed on the following relevant facts:
(1)
Officer Roland Clark placed Rainey in the shower.
(2) The
shower had very hot water in it.
(3)
Rainey screamed while in the shower trying to get out of the
shower.
(4)
Rainey died in the shower.
There are the important relevant facts. The State stresses in their written decision
that the witnesses didn’t agree on the actual time Rainey was placed in the
shower and when he started to yell. The
witnesses agreed he died at night on 6/23/12 and that he yelled while in the
shower, but the State Attorney nit-picks and blames witnesses to a brutal
murder that happened months shy of 5 years ago for not keeping accurate time of
when everything happened. The majority
of people in this world don’t think about documenting the time of when they are
witnessing a brutal murder and the details that lead to that murder. They are usually in shock and try to block
out what they witnessed.
The inmate witnesses all agreed on the important
facts:
(1)
Officer Roland Clark placed Rainey in the shower.
(2) The
shower had very hot water in it.
(3)
Rainey screamed in the shower trying to get out of the shower.
(4)
Rainey died in the shower.
I’m sure most (if not all) would agree with me
that these are the important facts.
Why did the Dade County State Attorney focus on
irrelevant facts and not these important facts?
Because to Katherine Fernandez Rundle, Darren Rainey was a poor, black,
mentally disabled, Muslim prisoner, and his life did not matter. If Ms Rundle would have filed charges against
Officer Clarke
(1) She
would have been prosecuting an officer who is a member of the PBA – a group
strong enough to get her out of office.
(2) The
State Attorney would’ve had to pay a large quantity of money to prosecute the
case and Rainey’s life to Ms Rundle wasn’t worth what it cost.
(3) She
would’ve broke the pattern her office has had for a very very long time of not
prosecuting law enforcement officials who unlawfully murder African
Americans.
These are the reasons why Ms Rundle in her 3/17/17
decision decided to focus on small irrelevant facts and not relevant facts.
Please share this blog with your friends and
whoever you think could help with obtaining justice for the murder of Darren
Rainey. Please contact Revs. Jesse
Jackson, Al Sharpton and the founders of Black Lives Matter and ask them for
help in getting justice for Darren Rainey.
Please sign our petition on Change.org entitled THE LIFE OF BLACK, MENTALLY DISABLED MUSLIM PRISONER DARREN RAINEY DOES
MATTER.
Caged Crusader
----------------------------------------------
Here's an interview between Cat Watters of People's Internet Radio
and Jeremy Schanche, 5th April, 2017:
Here's an interview between Cat Watters of People's Internet Radio
and Jeremy Schanche, 5th April, 2017:
Please follow Harold Hempstead's blog for regular updates:
Harold Hempstead Caged Crusader Wordpress
No comments:
Post a Comment